In reverse chronological order -
Today's race – Mother's day 4 miler
My goal was to run the entire race in under 28 mins, at least matching my time from a couple of weeks ago.
Comps:
Last year's Mom's day – May 11th – 28:17 (which seemed unbelievably fast at the time and for a long time thereafter – my fastest per mile race by far up until that point)
Run for the Parks – April 11th 2009 – 27:48
Today's race – 27:32
Splits – Mile 1 6:49
Mile 2 6:41
Mile 3 7:10
Mile 4 6:49
The stupid hill on Mile 3 always kills me (but I can't complain when mile #4 is straight down hill). Overall I am very pleased both for breaking my PR and for maintaining my tradition of 'doing it for Mom' (including this year Steph!) and running my fastest on Mom's day.
Now let's hope that unlike last year I continue to peak all the way through the Summer.
A final thought – this was a taxing race. My AVERAGE heart rate was 181. I'll have to check the pace and heart rate against the Run for the Parks...but I think that this shows that I'm a bit further out of shape that I was in April. Time to hit the streets a bit harder. But the new shoes (got racing shoes as my old racers were spent) helped out a ton.
Friday's run
A little 2.22 miler out and back. First with my brand new, proper, shoes. I went out fast and tried to beat my time coming back, which I did easily. In retrospect, I wonder if I used a bit of energy on Friday and this caused my elevated heart rate in today's race?
Out (downhill) 16:23 HRM Ave 158 Pace: 7:23
Return (slight uphill) 15:46 HRM Ave 171 Pace: 7:03
note the difference in heart rate – which includes starting from basically scratch both times (long wait, like 10 mins between runs).
Sunday Night Run
5.92miles
53:43
Perhaps interestingly, I had to stop – for the first time basically ever as my forefoot (right and to a lesser degree my left) throbbed with pain. When I got home I realized that I was a. wearing the wrong shoes (I have high arches and these shoes are for normal footed folks) and b. I flex my foot really hard when sitting at this and my work computer. Since then I've been working to address both factors. The sitting was easy – just mentally break the habit. I also ordered some new shoes (which are working like a charm, as you can see above).
Sunday, May 10, 2009
Friday, May 1, 2009
Vienna Scenic Route - Travel
Week long trip to Vienna didnt' stop the running (although I only got one run in).
1:30 with a low - 138 average bpm ran over 9 miles - so that's good.
1:30 with a low - 138 average bpm ran over 9 miles - so that's good.
Saturday, April 25, 2009
Back at it after a week off
My last run wasn't the most fun, and it knocked some of the MoJo out of me, so I took the week off. Not something I can do in a month or so, but nothing that I'm too worried about now. Plus I have a big meeting (oh yeah!) this week so I was putting in a bit more time at work than typical.
Today's run was supposed to be nice and slow, but I didn't really have that discipline and ended up going out reasonably fast (for me).
Run: 10.27 miles (I don't care anymore what MapMyRuns says, it's always too short).
Time: 1:31 with a couple of stops - for water, to tie shoes, for traffic, blah, blah it was a training run
Felt great and it was nice to be in the double digits again.
Next stop Vienna - I hope to run there on Monday afternoon local time, with an immediate blog to get on my MapMyRun globe to the right here.
Today's run was supposed to be nice and slow, but I didn't really have that discipline and ended up going out reasonably fast (for me).
Run: 10.27 miles (I don't care anymore what MapMyRuns says, it's always too short).
Time: 1:31 with a couple of stops - for water, to tie shoes, for traffic, blah, blah it was a training run
Felt great and it was nice to be in the double digits again.
Next stop Vienna - I hope to run there on Monday afternoon local time, with an immediate blog to get on my MapMyRun globe to the right here.
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
Finally a run during the week....
Wow....been a long time. After my sore knees got better (only a week or so) and my broken toe healed (it's been 6 or 7 weeks now) I finally committed to get back out there even if it means giving up some sleep time.
I ran the Colon Challenge cuz I signed up, but the 15k after not running for a month was brutal on me and my toe was complaining most of the way. Despite that I was pleased with my time and ran a consistent 10min/mile pace. You can see from the photos that I was suffering though...




Yesterday morning I was up at 6:30 and hit the pavement. Here are the stats:
you can see that I did have to walk a couple of times - I went out a little too hard at first, and had to do the first walk, then the second one...just lazy I guess....the third walk, I manage to power up a major hill without walking which pushed my HR over 180 so I had to walk that one off before jogging the long hill back down to home.
Grabbed a quick shower, saw the kids, talked to Susan then zoom out the door to make it through the 60+min commute to the office in time for 9am. Today I took a day off. My legs are a little sore but my knees and toe both feel fine and I'm in better spirits in general. Will hit the pavement again tomorrow for another run.
Here's the map of my route:
http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=2753532 apparently my nike+ is off a bit as it logged me in at less mileage than the map reads. My footpod on my HR was a little more accurate tracking me at 3.95miles and a 9:55 pace. In the end, I ran, didn't die and am psyched to get up and go again tomorrow so I'm not going to worry about the small mileage and pace differentials!
More Tomorrow!
I ran the Colon Challenge cuz I signed up, but the 15k after not running for a month was brutal on me and my toe was complaining most of the way. Despite that I was pleased with my time and ran a consistent 10min/mile pace. You can see from the photos that I was suffering though...




Yesterday morning I was up at 6:30 and hit the pavement. Here are the stats:
you can see that I did have to walk a couple of times - I went out a little too hard at first, and had to do the first walk, then the second one...just lazy I guess....the third walk, I manage to power up a major hill without walking which pushed my HR over 180 so I had to walk that one off before jogging the long hill back down to home.
Grabbed a quick shower, saw the kids, talked to Susan then zoom out the door to make it through the 60+min commute to the office in time for 9am. Today I took a day off. My legs are a little sore but my knees and toe both feel fine and I'm in better spirits in general. Will hit the pavement again tomorrow for another run.
Here's the map of my route:
http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=2753532 apparently my nike+ is off a bit as it logged me in at less mileage than the map reads. My footpod on my HR was a little more accurate tracking me at 3.95miles and a 9:55 pace. In the end, I ran, didn't die and am psyched to get up and go again tomorrow so I'm not going to worry about the small mileage and pace differentials!
More Tomorrow!
Sunday, April 19, 2009
Who needs the subway? Ran to the race and then ran the race.
While preparing for today's race last night I learned that it's about the same amount of time to run to Central Park as it is to take the subway. This is particularly true with weekend service delays.
So before running in the official race I jogged up to the start - which left me relatively tired and without a number (didn't have enough time before the start). So I comfortably snugged in with the back of the pack and awaited the start.
4 miles and a little over 31 minutes later I was done. Of course this is much, much slower than my recent PR. But I was proud to finish (these were miles 6.6 through 10.6 run today - so from that perspective not bad). Also, my last 1/2 was run at above an 8 min per mile pace, so compared to that I was moving...
Still I never felt in the groove today and fighting all the people (even though I passed a pretty good number of folks, which felt good) took its toll.
Next week will be better and I'll run more than this week. Also, I'm looking forward to running in Vienna at the end of the month!
I think I can get my per mile down to somewhere in the mid-7's (7:35) for these longer runs. But even the progression from 8:05 to 7:50 is okay considering how I felt.
Needless to say, I took the subway home! The $2 was well spent and so was I.
So before running in the official race I jogged up to the start - which left me relatively tired and without a number (didn't have enough time before the start). So I comfortably snugged in with the back of the pack and awaited the start.
4 miles and a little over 31 minutes later I was done. Of course this is much, much slower than my recent PR. But I was proud to finish (these were miles 6.6 through 10.6 run today - so from that perspective not bad). Also, my last 1/2 was run at above an 8 min per mile pace, so compared to that I was moving...
Last Name | Overall Place | Gender Place | Age Place | Finish Time | Pace/ Mile | AG % |
| PARKS | 1662 | 1369 | 275 | 31:21 | 7:50 | 55.2 % |
Still I never felt in the groove today and fighting all the people (even though I passed a pretty good number of folks, which felt good) took its toll.
Next week will be better and I'll run more than this week. Also, I'm looking forward to running in Vienna at the end of the month!
I think I can get my per mile down to somewhere in the mid-7's (7:35) for these longer runs. But even the progression from 8:05 to 7:50 is okay considering how I felt.
Needless to say, I took the subway home! The $2 was well spent and so was I.
Sunday, April 12, 2009
Slow recovery run
Simply put I've been taking the concept of 'rest days' way too seriously. Who knows when the next time I'll get to run. Clearly not tomorrow night as my father in law is coming to dinner (thankfully!). So in the last hour of sunlight I threw on the shoes and hit the streets.
My goal was to keep my heart rate below 155 bpm at all costs. So I ended up walking whenever I hit 155 and showed a considerable amount of discipline to keep an average rate of 148 throughout the run. Needless to say I absolutely adore my Heart Rate Monitor. One simply cannot run this way without the instant feedback. Perhaps I am overly technical but that's the way I am, so this is the way I train. The result is that I ran 9.13 miles (by both MapMyRun and the GPS, so that's a first!) and I felt very, very strongly that I could have continued.
However, I'd already run 20 + miles in 3 days and also had run for 1:24.09 - so I'd probably had enough...still I didn't feel tired or 'done'. Instead I felt great. This is the huge advantage to running aerobically.
At this pace I can enjoy the scenery - something that I noticed today that I 'zone out' on my typical run.
Another funny one - as I was crossing the Manhattan Bridge I really had to slow it down (but NOT walk) to keep my heart rate down. It wasn't until a couple of miles later that I realized that I was running straight into a 12 - 25 mile an hour wind. When I turned off of the protected West Side Drive, on to the causeway in Battery City Park, I was hit straight in the face with the river-level cold breeze - 'that explained my slow cross of the Manhattan Bridge' I thought. That way I ran back, I only got the wind at my back for the Brooklyn Bridge crossing.
Still 9:15 average at 148 isn't horrid. And this race was designed to clear out anything from the 10k and to continue to build the base.
My goal was to keep my heart rate below 155 bpm at all costs. So I ended up walking whenever I hit 155 and showed a considerable amount of discipline to keep an average rate of 148 throughout the run. Needless to say I absolutely adore my Heart Rate Monitor. One simply cannot run this way without the instant feedback. Perhaps I am overly technical but that's the way I am, so this is the way I train. The result is that I ran 9.13 miles (by both MapMyRun and the GPS, so that's a first!) and I felt very, very strongly that I could have continued.
However, I'd already run 20 + miles in 3 days and also had run for 1:24.09 - so I'd probably had enough...still I didn't feel tired or 'done'. Instead I felt great. This is the huge advantage to running aerobically.
At this pace I can enjoy the scenery - something that I noticed today that I 'zone out' on my typical run.
Another funny one - as I was crossing the Manhattan Bridge I really had to slow it down (but NOT walk) to keep my heart rate down. It wasn't until a couple of miles later that I realized that I was running straight into a 12 - 25 mile an hour wind. When I turned off of the protected West Side Drive, on to the causeway in Battery City Park, I was hit straight in the face with the river-level cold breeze - 'that explained my slow cross of the Manhattan Bridge' I thought. That way I ran back, I only got the wind at my back for the Brooklyn Bridge crossing.
Still 9:15 average at 148 isn't horrid. And this race was designed to clear out anything from the 10k and to continue to build the base.
Saturday, April 11, 2009
10k Scotland Run results in another PR
As the announcer said, 'the Scots managed to bring their weather with them' and he wasn't joking.
Distance: 6.2 Miles, 10.0 Kilometers
Date/Time: April 11, 2009, 10:00 am
Location: Central Park, NYC
Weather: 48 degrees, 93% humidity, rain.
My hands felt frozen in the warm-up and in the corral waiting for the start of the race. There was really nothing I could do to get warm - and the first mile's heart rate shows it - it was a real bear to get started - and I had to slow myself down about the 3/4 mile point not to speed through. I was very happy to have heart rate feedback, as I slowed dramatically (in the first mile and again on the big hill in Mile 4 to keep from blowing out).
Splits:
Mile 1: 7:13
Mile 2: 7:09
Mile 3: 7:09
Mile 4: 7:40 (huge hill)
Mile 5: 7:10 (regained focus)
Mile 6: 7:23 (lost focus? Or just couldn't keep the pace...)
Rest: 1:32
Overall I'm overjoyed. I beat my goal time of 46 minutes by a mile. I almost made my long ago stretch goal of completing a 10k in 45 minutes (but that will have to wait until another time).
Looking back, there is only really one thing that I'm not happy with - my 'kick' or lack thereof. I tend to go out too fast and then hold on until the end. This year and last year I ran the last 0.2 miles in the same amount of time (90 seconds in 08 and 91 seconds this year). I'd like finish stronger. Still taking 30 seconds per mile off my time feels pretty great. And too think that it felt like moving last time!
Comparison of my per mile times in 2008 (pink) and 2009 (blue) - you can see that the slow first mile cost me last year and I never really recovered. Still the 40 second per mile faster pace through the first few miles increased that lead (hard to see here).
Here you can see how hard I had to work over the first mile this year to get started. Nice to see though that I was moving more quickly and spending less effort to do it - that's text book better training. And to think that I'm 'only' running a couple of days per week. Let's see how this Summer's training goes.
Over all a very good result. I'm happy, especially that I didn't let the rain interfere with getting the work done.
Distance: 6.2 Miles, 10.0 Kilometers
Date/Time: April 11, 2009, 10:00 am
Location: Central Park, NYC
Weather: 48 degrees, 93% humidity, rain.
My hands felt frozen in the warm-up and in the corral waiting for the start of the race. There was really nothing I could do to get warm - and the first mile's heart rate shows it - it was a real bear to get started - and I had to slow myself down about the 3/4 mile point not to speed through. I was very happy to have heart rate feedback, as I slowed dramatically (in the first mile and again on the big hill in Mile 4 to keep from blowing out).
Splits:
Mile 1: 7:13
Mile 2: 7:09
Mile 3: 7:09
Mile 4: 7:40 (huge hill)
Mile 5: 7:10 (regained focus)
Mile 6: 7:23 (lost focus? Or just couldn't keep the pace...)
Rest: 1:32
| Last Name | First Name | Sex/ Age | Bib | Overall Place | Gender Place | Age Place |
| PARKS | JOSHUA | M36 | 1503 | 1041 | 917 | 191 |
Finish Time | Pace/ Mile | AG Time | AG Gender Place | AG % |
| 45:17 | 7:18 | 44:03 | 1102 | 60.9 % |
Overall I'm overjoyed. I beat my goal time of 46 minutes by a mile. I almost made my long ago stretch goal of completing a 10k in 45 minutes (but that will have to wait until another time).
Looking back, there is only really one thing that I'm not happy with - my 'kick' or lack thereof. I tend to go out too fast and then hold on until the end. This year and last year I ran the last 0.2 miles in the same amount of time (90 seconds in 08 and 91 seconds this year). I'd like finish stronger. Still taking 30 seconds per mile off my time feels pretty great. And too think that it felt like moving last time!
Comparison of my per mile times in 2008 (pink) and 2009 (blue) - you can see that the slow first mile cost me last year and I never really recovered. Still the 40 second per mile faster pace through the first few miles increased that lead (hard to see here).Heart Rate (upper) and Altitude (lower) '08 vs. '09
Here you can see how hard I had to work over the first mile this year to get started. Nice to see though that I was moving more quickly and spending less effort to do it - that's text book better training. And to think that I'm 'only' running a couple of days per week. Let's see how this Summer's training goes.Over all a very good result. I'm happy, especially that I didn't let the rain interfere with getting the work done.
Friday, April 10, 2009
Scotland Run warmup - Maintenance Drop
Ran to drop off the monthly maintenance and just kept running. Stayed in the 145 - 155 bpm band - using my new hrm band.
Time taken - 44 mins
Generally pretty uneventful, save the fact that I'm nearly two minutes faster at this relatively sane bpm band relative to when I started slowing down to go faster. It is amazing how long it takes to improve and then how quickly the results build up.
Tomorrow's the Scotland 10k - last year I did it in 48:24. I can safely say that I will crush this PR tomorrow. Last year I ran with my good friend Mika. We ran that race like this:
Mile 1: 9:25 (huge crowds to manage at the start)
Mile 2: 8:00
Mile 3: 8:05
Mile 4: 7:35
Mile 5: 7:25
Mile 6: 7:20
Last: 1:30 (I hope that works out)
Average pace 7:48 - My PR is 7:47 from December 7th.
I don't want to put too much pressure on, but I do expect to perform considerably better in this race tomorrow. Let's see where the splits come in. I am going to go out on a limb and predict a finish of around 46 minutes or thereabouts. My personal goal from a long, long time ago was to run a 45 minute 10k. I've clearly never done that, but tomorrow I might just go out and try.
Time taken - 44 mins
Generally pretty uneventful, save the fact that I'm nearly two minutes faster at this relatively sane bpm band relative to when I started slowing down to go faster. It is amazing how long it takes to improve and then how quickly the results build up.
Tomorrow's the Scotland 10k - last year I did it in 48:24. I can safely say that I will crush this PR tomorrow. Last year I ran with my good friend Mika. We ran that race like this:
Mile 1: 9:25 (huge crowds to manage at the start)
Mile 2: 8:00
Mile 3: 8:05
Mile 4: 7:35
Mile 5: 7:25
Mile 6: 7:20
Last: 1:30 (I hope that works out)
Average pace 7:48 - My PR is 7:47 from December 7th.
I don't want to put too much pressure on, but I do expect to perform considerably better in this race tomorrow. Let's see where the splits come in. I am going to go out on a limb and predict a finish of around 46 minutes or thereabouts. My personal goal from a long, long time ago was to run a 45 minute 10k. I've clearly never done that, but tomorrow I might just go out and try.
Sunday, April 5, 2009
Sub 28 minute 4 miler sets new PR! By almost 30 seconds...
My goal for today's race was to at least beat my time from last year's race of 28:53 or 7:13. I was thinking that, more likely, I would run between my most recent 5k pace of 7:09 and my PR pace for 4 miles of 7:04 (last Mother's Day). As a stretch goal, I hoped to break 28 minutes, maybe. Instead I got a great start and ended up blowing all my expectations away.
Distance: 4 miles (with a 1 mile warm up and cool down)
Breakdown:
1 - 7:05 (crowded and hilly)
2 - 6:48 (thinned out, downhill)
3 - 7:09 (slightly uphill)
Put me spot on 21 minutes at the 3 mile turn - I said to myself 'I've got to finish this strong and beat the 28 minute mark!'
4- 6:45 (downhill)
Needless to say I was elated at the finish and very pleased with my performance. This the first time that I've gotten out of the 60% AG and into the 62%s.
For more information on the results of all the races I've run with NYRR click here.
Distance: 4 miles (with a 1 mile warm up and cool down)
Breakdown:
1 - 7:05 (crowded and hilly)
2 - 6:48 (thinned out, downhill)
3 - 7:09 (slightly uphill)
Put me spot on 21 minutes at the 3 mile turn - I said to myself 'I've got to finish this strong and beat the 28 minute mark!'
4- 6:45 (downhill)
Last Name | First Name | Sex/ Age | Bib | Team | Overall Place | Gender Place |
| PARKS | JOSHUA | M36 | 1458 | BRRC | 439 | 411 |
Age Place | Finish Time | Pace/ Mile | AG Time | AG Gender Place | AG % |
| 100 | 27:48 | 6:57 | 27:02 | 558 | 62.3 % |
Needless to say I was elated at the finish and very pleased with my performance. This the first time that I've gotten out of the 60% AG and into the 62%s.
For more information on the results of all the races I've run with NYRR click here.
Thursday, April 2, 2009
Times Square to Home (nearly)
Tonight I ran from just West of Times Square to home, cutting across Chambers and then back across the Brooklyn Bridge.
GPS suggested that the route was 6.6 miles. Mapmyrun says 6.3 - oh well.
I tend to think that the 6.6 was right as I was MOVING and my watch suggested that I averaged 7:45 over the distance - that feels about right. Not necessarily pushing it but definitely focused and concentrated. Felt fantastic and would have gone longer but want to run hills tomorrow (perhaps) and have a race on Sunday (short, but still want to have some legs left). Imagined that I could have done another 3 or even 4 miles no problem at that pace...
GPS suggested that the route was 6.6 miles. Mapmyrun says 6.3 - oh well.
I tend to think that the 6.6 was right as I was MOVING and my watch suggested that I averaged 7:45 over the distance - that feels about right. Not necessarily pushing it but definitely focused and concentrated. Felt fantastic and would have gone longer but want to run hills tomorrow (perhaps) and have a race on Sunday (short, but still want to have some legs left). Imagined that I could have done another 3 or even 4 miles no problem at that pace...
Sunday, March 29, 2009
Back in the Brooklyn/NYC Saddle Again!
It's good to be home. Went out for my typical training run and ended up competing a good one. Misty, threatening rain the entire time...but I made it and did a pretty good job.
Details -
Distance: 9.33 miles
Time: 1:14:30
Pace: 8 min per mile (spot on)
Only real comment is that I'd thought that my original version of this included a trip around City Hall, so I ran around City Hall after coming out of the South Street Seaport. Turns out that loop is new and different from before. Compare this result to my run on March 11th - there I ran 8.71 miles in 1:13. Here I did 9.33 in a minute longer. Again I didn't 'push it' at all, just nice and steady and easy. Felt great. Excellent to be back at it. Perhaps those hills that I ran in Belgium paid dividends on this run? I felt a slightly better push off during my stride and definitely maintained a better cadence than before.
A final thought - I signed up for the 100 miles in 31 days Challenge at MapMyRun.com. So I have 31 days from today to get the 100 miles in. I'm at 9.33 - so I have 90.67 miles to go. I figure that I can average 3.3 miles per day for this next month...why not? It's a good challenge at least.
Details -
Distance: 9.33 miles
Time: 1:14:30
Pace: 8 min per mile (spot on)
Only real comment is that I'd thought that my original version of this included a trip around City Hall, so I ran around City Hall after coming out of the South Street Seaport. Turns out that loop is new and different from before. Compare this result to my run on March 11th - there I ran 8.71 miles in 1:13. Here I did 9.33 in a minute longer. Again I didn't 'push it' at all, just nice and steady and easy. Felt great. Excellent to be back at it. Perhaps those hills that I ran in Belgium paid dividends on this run? I felt a slightly better push off during my stride and definitely maintained a better cadence than before.
A final thought - I signed up for the 100 miles in 31 days Challenge at MapMyRun.com. So I have 31 days from today to get the 100 miles in. I'm at 9.33 - so I have 90.67 miles to go. I figure that I can average 3.3 miles per day for this next month...why not? It's a good challenge at least.
Thursday, March 26, 2009
Stockholm Syndrome
Meeting went on and on. Needed to get out and run despite my hacking cough and occasional shooting pain down my right thigh (from coughing too hard and potentially from a wee bit of lactic acid in there from the hills of Genval, see below).
Ran for 1:06 and got in 7.5 miles and got lost. So in the end I probably ran another 1.5 miles trying to find the hotel - which I did but not in time for dinner.
Missing dinner was actually a good thing as I had a glass of wine with the team (for my heart and to be social) and felt as though I didn't miss anything. These meetings sometimes feel like feeding frenzies.
Miss my heart rate monitor - need to replace that bad boy soon.
And by the way it was pitch black, great for seeing the City lights but horrid for being in a 100 acre park that you've never visited in the day!
Ran for 1:06 and got in 7.5 miles and got lost. So in the end I probably ran another 1.5 miles trying to find the hotel - which I did but not in time for dinner.
Missing dinner was actually a good thing as I had a glass of wine with the team (for my heart and to be social) and felt as though I didn't miss anything. These meetings sometimes feel like feeding frenzies.
Miss my heart rate monitor - need to replace that bad boy soon.
And by the way it was pitch black, great for seeing the City lights but horrid for being in a 100 acre park that you've never visited in the day!
Saturday, March 21, 2009
The hills of Genval
Ran twice around the Lake (Lac) with Dom(e) Hein aka Pierre. After the warm up, headed to the long hill that my hosts used to live on. Then, in around 4 minutes per go I ran up hill 0.4 miles on average each time. After each run I walked back to the lowest point and started again. The best news was that I ran the last loop as quickly as any of the others.
Today my bum hurts, so perhaps I made some progress, perhaps. I'll throw these kinds of runs into my weekly pursuit of completing the 2009 Marathon as I hear that it's important to push the lower body's muscle groups vis-a-vis hill runs like this.
Given all the walking the time frame of the workout isn't really relevant. Although I did beat my time from the day before on the laps of the lake!
Today my bum hurts, so perhaps I made some progress, perhaps. I'll throw these kinds of runs into my weekly pursuit of completing the 2009 Marathon as I hear that it's important to push the lower body's muscle groups vis-a-vis hill runs like this.
Given all the walking the time frame of the workout isn't really relevant. Although I did beat my time from the day before on the laps of the lake!
Friday, March 20, 2009
Early evening Genval Run
Visiting Dom and Mlo I couldn't help but to run around their lake.
22:40 for two laps wasn't bad.
22:40 for two laps wasn't bad.
Saturday, March 14, 2009
Grandfather's 90th celebratory run
Got up early and jumped out for a long, slow run. Was cold and rainy - 38 degrees f
took around 1 hour 8 minutes to complete the loop. Felt great to be in the old neighborhood of my grandparents. Sure miss the Pacific weather.
took around 1 hour 8 minutes to complete the loop. Felt great to be in the old neighborhood of my grandparents. Sure miss the Pacific weather.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)